Article 50 transparency

Distinguish provider duties, deployer duties and legal applicability.

What the baseline contains

15 structured records from P06_AI_Transparency. The source workbook is a historical portfolio model, not verified operational evidence.

What is implemented

Selected tests distinguish provider interaction and marking duties from deployer disclosures. Missing fields never produce a passing result.

Inspect the engineering

policies/ai.rego and fixtures/ai-system.json in the downloadable repository package. Open the executive observatory to inspect the modeled risk register and current technical snapshot.

Decision boundary

Exceptions, scope and transition dates require recorded legal review. Metadata alone does not prove robust marking or substantive compliance.

Review procedure

1. Establish system scope, owner, observation period and evidence provenance.
2. Execute the applicable check and inspect unknown, stale or failed results.
3. Record an evidence-linked finding, assign a treatment owner and set a review date.
4. Retest with new evidence. Keep the earlier snapshot and the reviewer’s conclusion.